The Literary Life

Home » Taste » ARE STANDARDS FOR LITERARY TASTE IMPORTANT? WHAT ABOUT LITERARY JUDGMENT?

ARE STANDARDS FOR LITERARY TASTE IMPORTANT? WHAT ABOUT LITERARY JUDGMENT?

Previous Posts

September 2015
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,603 other followers

4ea9c73cd22bf87f281022181db263e0

Plenty of people would deny that standards for literary taste are important or even desirable. Doesn’t everybody have a right to his or her own tastes? These are important questions for anyone living the literary life and for whom serious literature matters. Who decides what is serious literature anyway?

Just for the sake of having a text to respond to for these questions I have been showing you some things David Hume, our friend from the 18th century, says in Of the Standard of Taste had to say.

I ran into Hume years ago as an undergraduate. It took me years, though, really to appreciate him (or Hume). Maybe it was because I read him in a used textbook from the college bookstore.

Anyway, Hume distinguishes between sentiment and judgment. Sentiment is what most of us think of when we refer to individual tastes. It is solely personal and therefore indisputable.

Literary judgment is something else altogether. Unlike sentiment, judgment resides outside of our selves. If I say I don’t like Steven Spielberg’s movies because I hated E.T. and all his movies were spoiled after that, I am merely expressing my personal sentiment, Hume would say.

But if I condemn outright all Steven Spielberg movies and insist they are all trash produced by an idiot, I am simply showing up myself to be the foolish one. I am displaying my poor taste. Wouldn’t just about anyone agree? Sure I can dislike Spielberg’s movies all I want. But I really cannot judge them based simply on my experience with E.T., can I? Why? Because the standard judgment of Spielberg’s movies is different from my personal sentiment?

What do you think? Use whatever terminology you like, but are there differences between personal and impersonal responses to a work of literature?

So Hume says, “It is natural for us to seek a Standard of Taste: a rule, by which the various sentiments of men may be reconciled; at least a decision, afforded, confirming one sentiment, and abandoning another.” Hmm.

Artistic beauty, then, Hume goes on to say, appeals to our common sentiments shared by all simply by reason of our being human? Do you agree? Is Hume right? Are we, by chance, human still today in postmodernity the same way Hume thinks of being human in 18th-century mid to upper class England?

While opinions might vary, Hume would continue, emotional responses are universal–to readers of sound judgment.  Alas, there’s the rub.

Not many people have sound judgment; many are uncultivated, confused, inexperienced, not sufficiently educated, or simply apathetic.

Thus, for David Hume, as I partially quoted in an earlier post, “Among a thousand different opinions which different men may entertain of the same subject, there is one, and but one, that is just and true; and the only difficulty is to fix and ascertain it.”

So there you have it; we just need to distinguish between sentiment and judgment? When I figured this out years ago it was an eye-opener, the difference between sentiment and judgment.

Is Hume right? Is there any application to how we think of literary taste today? Perhaps we can change the terminology. But is the dichotomy still relevant?

Make comments. Let’s start a conversation. Re-blog. Re-tweet. Follow The Literary Life. The more readers who are posting comments the better.

Paul Varner

 

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. Pat says:

    The rub, to me, is who decides what is sound judgment.

    Like

    • Paul Varner says:

      That’s always the rub, isn’t it? In the next few installments I will show you what Hume says. But, isn’t it obvious that somebody or something is determining what the differences are between good taste and bad taste simply because there are some extremes that are so great that almost nobody would see it as good taste? Or extremes that are so great by way of genius, reputation, etc. that to disdain would be to reveal bad taste? If there are extremes which cause no controversy, what about with matters not extreme? What do you think?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 3,353 hits
Follow The Literary Life on WordPress.com

Goodreads

Follow me on Twitter

Follow me on Twitter

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,603 other followers

The Hoarding

On 19th-Century Literary Scholarship

cancer killing recipe

Just another WordPress.com site

MUDD iN YOUR FACE

from boredom to creativity

Proof Perfectly

Editing - Copywriting - Advice

deconstructingdoctor.com

a peek behind the curtain

The Long Victorian - c.1789 - 1914

The literary world of the Long Nineteenth Century, c.1789 - 1914

Under the Light of Western Skies

Intellectual Comfort from the American West

The Scene

Radical Poetics at the Zig Zag Edges

The Literary Life

A Site for Those for whom Serious Literature Matters

The Literary Counsellor

Mainly a book blog, with a bit of life thrown in for good measure.

A Poet's Double Life

For poets working outside the literary world.

Rosemary's Blog

A window into my world

Lizzy's Literary Life

Celebrating the pleasures of a 21st century bookworm

Let's Talk about Lit

Moving Poetry Out of Books and Into Life

Witty N Pretty

Dallas Fashion Blogger

%d bloggers like this: