The Literary Life

Home » Taste » THE GREAT VARIETY OF LITERARY TASTE

THE GREAT VARIETY OF LITERARY TASTE

Previous Posts

September 2015
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,603 other followers

3e5ed7ede10a91cf98e07441115eb07f

This morning I am writing from my favorite coffee shop—Mezamiz Deux Coffee House. I love coffee and in my life as a scholar I heartily accepted the motto that scholars are machines for turning coffee into ideas. Now I’ve got to adapt that saying for readers as well. Oh well, let’s begin.

Why is it that great literature means so much for our lives? Of course, we could all easily tell about our favorite authors or our favorite books. But, more generally, can we isolate some of the reasons great literature, as a whole, matters so much to us?

Such questions as this, the really big questions of great literature, I want to keep exploring in A Literary Life. After all, such questions and their answers distinguish a life of literature from, say, a life of sports, or even a life of television watching.

Thus, again, matters of Taste that we are looking at recently.

We look all around us and we see an endless variety of tastes in our culture for literature and entertainment media. So much so that the most common responses to questions of taste, and of what makes something great literature anyway, are that all tastes are acceptable today and that distinctions between great literature and popular literature—or between what we once called high culture and low culture—are no longer relevant. Why do such attitudes prevail? Have they always prevailed or is our age distinct?

Our friend David Hume, the Enlightenment philosopher known for claiming, “There is no disputing of tastes,” acknowledges in Of the Standard of Taste that even in his day most people felt their individual tastes to be equal to everybody’s taste: “The great variety of Taste. . . which prevails in the world” is obvious to all.

Why is there such variety? Hume claims it is because most people “of confined knowledge” share the prejudices of their limited circle and their limited knowledge.

So what is the source of the idea that all tastes are equally valid? Is it perhaps that most people’s acquaintance with literature—good or bad—is limited?

How does this idea work? Someone you know reads widely and voraciously. He or she spends a fortune on books from Barnes & Noble. Yet their total reading experience is limited to the same kind of literature. Maybe, all they ever read are paperback westerns. Does Hume have a point? What are some implications?

He makes the contrast with “those who can enlarge their view to contemplate distant nations and remote ages” whose tastes are far broader than those who are limited.

Now, Hume does warn against arrogance and self-conceit—or in contemporary terms, against the dreaded elitism. Even the most highly educated—at least insofar as their reading is concerned—display a great variety of taste among themselves.

All this sounds pretty much like pitting the common readers against effete literary snobs. And it probably is. But, Hume says the great variety of taste among the best readers, if you will, is really not so diverse. It is “greater in reality than experience.” The vast disparity among tastes exists among those with limited experience. Not so much among those with a wide range of experience as readers.

Are these observations of David Hume from the eighteenth century still relevant for our postmodern twenty-first century? Does the great variety of taste extend to all levels of literary readership? Is it true that the tendency to claim all kinds of literary tastes equally valid comes primarily from very limited views of literature and the world around us?

Leave comments. Re-blog this post and talk about these things as you lead a literary life.

Paul Varner

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 3,359 hits
Follow The Literary Life on WordPress.com

Goodreads

Follow me on Twitter

Follow me on Twitter

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,603 other followers

The Hoarding

On 19th-Century Literary Scholarship

cancer killing recipe

Just another WordPress.com site

MUDD iN YOUR FACE

from boredom to creativity

Proof Perfectly

Editing - Copywriting - Advice

deconstructingdoctor.com

a peek behind the curtain

The Long Victorian - c.1789 - 1914

The literary world of the Long Nineteenth Century, c.1789 - 1914

Under the Light of Western Skies

Intellectual Comfort from the American West

The Scene

Radical Poetics at the Zig Zag Edges

The Literary Life

A Site for Those for whom Serious Literature Matters

The Literary Counsellor

Mainly a book blog, with a bit of life thrown in for good measure.

A Poet's Double Life

For poets working outside the literary world.

Rosemary's Blog

A window into my world

Lizzy's Literary Life

Celebrating the pleasures of a 21st century bookworm

Let's Talk about Lit

Moving Poetry Out of Books and Into Life

Witty N Pretty

Dallas Fashion Blogger

%d bloggers like this: